Van Hollen, Senate Democrats Urge Republican-Controlled Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to Oppose Proposal that Could Raise Electricity Prices for Millions of Americans, Jeopardize Thousands of Jobs, and Dramatically Increase Carbon Emissions
Senate Democrats Send Letter To Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Chairman Neil Chatterjee Condemning FERC’s Consideration Of Order That Would Undermine State Policies Designed To Support Clean Energy, Hike Electricity Prices For Millions, Kill Thousands Of Jobs, And Increase Carbon Emissions
FERC Commission, Soon With 2-1 Republican Majority, Reportedly Considering A New Order That Would Hurt American People With Price Hikes And Job Cuts, Set Back Climate Crisis Fight
Senate Democrats To FERC Chairman Chatterjee: Senate Dems. Won’t Back Down—Rule By Republican FERC Commissioners Could Raise Electricity Prices, Kill Jobs, And Thwart State-Level Efforts To Confront Climate Crisis
Today, U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), along with Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Tom Carper (D-DE), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ben Cardin (D-MD), Bob Casey Jr. (D-PA), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Chris Coons (D-DE), and Cory Booker (D-NJ)today sent a letter to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Chairman Neil Chatterjee condemning the soon-to-be Republican-controlled commission’s consideration of an order that would severely undermine state policies designed to support clean energy, would unnecessarily raise electricity prices for 65 million homes and businesses, and would jeopardize thousands of jobs across the country.
The Republican FERC commissioners, with a 2 to 1 majority as of September 1, 2019, are reportedly considering a Minimum Offer Price Rule that would undercut PJM Interconnection (PJM) states’ clean energy policies and force consumers to pay for billions of dollars in unneeded, redundant capacity. The Senators note that on multiple occasions, the Republican FERC commissioners have expressed hostility to policies that benefit clean sources of energy.
The Senators pledge to fight the rule, which would significantly raise electricity prices for millions of Americans, cut thousands of jobs across PJM states, and roll back state progress to reduce air pollution and address the climate crisis. According to a recent study by the consulting firm Grid Strategies, the total costs of this policy change to consumers could be as high as $5.7 billion per year. The Senators strongly urge FERC not to move forward with the order.
Senate Democrats’ letter to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman Neil Chatterjee can be found here and below:
August 29, 2019
Dear Chairman Chatterjee:
We write to express significant concerns with a potential policy shift at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that may unnecessarily raise electricity prices for the 65 million homes and businesses and put at risk thousands of jobs in the 13 states served by PJM Interconnection (PJM), the nation’s largest grid operator. We are also troubled that this policy could severely undermine state policies designed to support clean energy and address climate change.
On multiple occasions, the Republican FERC commissioners have cited their concerns regarding state policies that support electricity generation from clean sources of energy. In a June 2018 order, FERC claimed that “out of market payments” supporting these sources of energy, including zero-emissions credits and renewable portfolio standards, threatened the integrity and effectiveness of the PJM capacity market. However, there is no evidence that these policies have resulted in resource adequacy problems sufficient to justify regulatory action, and efforts to mitigate these policies may interfere with the exclusive authority that Congress reserved to the states under the Federal Power Act to regulate facilities used for the generation of electricity. In fact, these credits and standards supporting cleaner sources of energy have created thousands of new jobs and have now created market conditions where resources like new wind and solar can lower costs for consumers.
With the upcoming departure of Commissioner LaFleur, it is our understanding that the Commission’s now two-to-one Republican majority is considering moving forward a Minimum Offer Price Rule that would overrule existing rules that allow state-supported clean generation to participate freely in the PJM capacity market. According to a recent study by the consulting firm Grid Strategies, the total costs of this policy change to consumers could be as high as $5.7 billion per year—increasing electricity costs by 60 percent compared to the current capacity market.
Needlessly increasing electricity prices for the millions served by PJM would be unacceptable, and state-level policies that support carbon-free electricity generation should not be harmed through federal overreach. Any action taken by FERC with respect to state policies must provide a meaningful and affordable option to support job-creating clean energy technologies. Accordingly, we strongly urge FERC to reconsider this policy shift and refrain from taking any action that could raise electricity prices or frustrate state efforts to address climate change.
Next Article Previous Article