Van Hollen, Hassan, Heinrich, Whitehouse, Colleagues Call on FERC to Reject Petition Aimed at Upending States’ Net Metering Programs
U.S. Senators Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) called on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to reject a petition by the New England Ratepayers Association (NERA) that aims to upend states’ net metering programs. Net metering allows consumers and businesses who generate some or all of their own electricity, particularly through wind and solar energy technology, to be compensated for the excess energy that they provide to the electric grid and other customers.
As the Members of Congress wrote in a letter to FERC, “States have engaged in deliberate, thoughtful processes to develop and implement net metering laws, which has led to the development of a renewable energy industry employing more than 800,000 workers nationwide.”
In making the case against NERA’s petition, the Members of Congress wrote, “If FERC granted NERA’s petition, it would overturn long-held precedent and give the federal government decision-making power that has long belonged to the states, including the authority to set rates, terms, and conditions for programs. These decisions are best left to state regulators.”
There is little public information available about who is paying for the New England Ratepayers Association and what their conflicts of interest may be, a concern that the Members of Congress raised in their letter. “It is also unclear based on public information whether this group actually represents any New England interests – consumer or corporate – and if it does, it is unclear why a group that advocates for ratepayers in New England is asking FERC for a sweeping order preempting net metering nationwide,” wrote the Members of Congress. “At a time when states need to ensure low-cost and reliable energy transactions for consumers, FERC should not upend 45 existing state policies – and certainly not at the behest of a group funded by twelve anonymous donors whose interests are unknown to FERC or the public.”
In addition to Senators Van Hollen, Hassan, Heinrich, and Whitehouse, the letter was signed by Senator Michael Bennet (D-CO), Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ), Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD), Senator Tom Carper (D-DE), Senator Chris Coons (D-DE), Senator Angus King (I-ME), Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Senator Ed Markey (D-MA), Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Senator Jack Reed (D-RI), Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Senator Tina Smith (D-MN), Senator Tom Udall (D-NM), Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Congressman David Cicilline (RI-01), Congresswoman Annie Kuster (NH-02), Congressman Chris Pappas (NH-01), and Congressman Peter Welch (VT-AL).
The full text of the letter is available here and below.
Dear Chairman Chatterjee,
We write to urge the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to reject the petition by the New England Ratepayers Association (NERA) calling on FERC to assert jurisdiction over 45 individual state net metering programs.
We strongly support net metering, a mechanism used by utilities, small businesses, farmers, and residential energy customers nationwide to reduce consumer costs, enhance reliability and increase clean energy supplies. On average with these systems, about 20 to 40 percent of a customer’s energy is fed back onto the distribution grid, helping create a more resilient, responsive and flexible power grid.
States have engaged in deliberate, thoughtful processes to develop and implement net metering laws, which has led to the development of a renewable energy industry employing more than 800,000 workers nationwide.
Preserving State Authority
States have always determined the rules and value of credits for their net metering programs. NERA’s petition challenges FERC’s longstanding policy, first set out in MidAmerican Energy Company, 94 FERC 61,340 (2001), that FERC does not have jurisdiction over sales from ratepayers to utilities if consumption is larger than production over a certain period. NERA’s petition asks that FERC upend this long-held position.
As the Supreme Court has noted, Congress wrote the Federal Power Act “to be a complement to and in no sense a usurpation of State regulatory authority.” If FERC granted NERA’s petition, it would overturn long-held precedent and give the federal government decision-making power that has long belonged to the states, including the authority to set rates, terms, and conditions for programs. These decisions are best left to state regulators.
Energy transfers from a ratepayer to a local utility are retail-level transactions. Customers are not installing systems to become large electricity producers, they are simply seeking to lower their power bills by investing in cost-saving and clean technology. Customers installed net-metered systems based on the promise – enshrined in the laws and policies of the respective states – that they would receive the credit approved by their commission or legislature on their electricity bills.
Sections 111(d) and 112(b) of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (16 USC 2621 and 2622) directs state regulators to consider adopting net metering:
SEC. 111(d)(11) NET METERING.—Each electric utility shall make available upon request net metering service to any electric consumer that the electric utility serves. For purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘net metering service’ means service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by that electric consumer from an eligible on-site generating facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provided by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period.
SEC. 112(b) […] Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, each State regulatory authority (with respect to each electric utility for which it has ratemaking authority), and each nonregulated electric utility, shall complete the consideration, and shall make the determination, referred to in section 111 with respect to each standard established by paragraphs (11) […]
This statute makes clear that Congress intended for net metering programs to fall under state jurisdiction, not FERC’s. If Congress intended for net metering to be priced pursuant to federal law, it would have so specified.
NERA formed in 2013 and is a tax-exempt 501(c)(4) non-profit organization that, according its webpage, advocates for rate payers across New England – specifically focused on energy and telecommunication issues. Their webpage says:
“NERA will advocate on behalf of ratepayers across a wide range of issues in every state in New England. From electricity costs in Massachusetts and Maine, water rates in New Hampshire, telecommunications issues in Vermont and Connecticut, natural gas costs in Rhode Island, and a host of other concerns that impact the region, NERA will be a voice for the ratepayers of New England.”
According to documents obtained by Public Citizen and public testimony submitted by NERA, the group represents the interests of only 12 undisclosed entities that contributed $245,000 in dues in 2018. It appears that NERA operates more like a trade association, representing the interests of a select number of industry or utility players, rather than a grassroots ratepayer group that represent the public interest. It is also unclear based on public information whether this group actually represents any New England interests – consumer or corporate – and if it does, it is unclear why a group that advocates for ratepayers in New England is asking FERC for a sweeping order preempting net metering nationwide.
NERA refuses to disclose the identities of the 12 entities that fund it, making it impossible to determine who is backing its petition. NERA should disclose its membership to FERC, so parties can understand who is asking for these important changes that will affect the 45 states with net metering laws in place. Disclosure will also help explain why NERA is making this request and whether this group will directly benefit from this policy change.
In prior decisions, FERC clearly determined that state regulators have authority over retail transactions. At a time when states need to ensure low-cost and reliable energy transactions for consumers, FERC should not upend 45 existing state policies – and certainly not at the behest of a group funded by twelve anonymous donors whose interests are unknown to FERC or the public, and which may be antithetical to the goals of the Federal Power Act. FERC should reject NERA’s petition to overturn nearly twenty years of FERC precedent and affirm that states have authority over net metering.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter, we look forward to your prompt response.
Next Article Previous Article